User talk:Neat Structure

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well not to sound rude or anything, but it was not me that wrote that #14 entries in the "Foster's Goes to Europe", I was just helping out the page a few days ago, and I though that it was just filler.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Why would you feel the need to come to my talk page instead of just DMing me about to say this or even in the edit summaries instead? This is not worth coming to my talk page for. Move on and please do not ever come back to my talk page, as you were already blocked before for constantly annoying me every time I either revert your edits or even called you out in the edit summaries for making bad edits.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well, sorry about that, I was just saying. But please don't block me again.

Pierce Ng (talkcontribs)

The episode contains the characters saying swearing words while the citizens of Townsville were so mad at hearing it.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

That's not the point. The point is how many people like/dislike the episode? This is the Reception Wikis for a reason.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

If you discover that more people dislike the episode than like it, then you can add it back. However, I feel that the list of bad episodes on the PPG article is enough as it is.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Hey, whats the deal with removing a few bits from "The Big Cheese"? I though they were good.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Because they are unnecessary.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well, I understand that, but why delete them now?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I just answered your question.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

What I mean is, why let them stay here and THEN all of a sudden delete them now if they are considered " unnecessary"?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Look kid, I'm not interested in arguing with you over something that's not even worth arguing about. I noticed you always want to start a "conversation" just to annoy people about why some of your edits get reverted. You always do that. I'm not having this discussion. Thank you.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well, I am not, thank you.

AlfeProblemSolverz (talkcontribs)

Donte has committed to making a Sock puppet account as you can tell by the fact that he wants Danger Force average numerous times. We need to warn the admins before things get worse.

AlfeProblemSolverz (talkcontribs)

Also, I don't mean it's a good thing that he's back since he already had a huge meltdown back when shows he wanted average, were not even close to the category.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Yeah, the Danger Force article has been protected for the time being. Also, besides Dante himself, a lot more has happen recently as of late. The Character Wikis have been closed permanently because of negative reception from not only the people outside Miraheze but also the people from within Miraheze as well. However, I completely disagree with them. They could have just simply deleted all the biased pages and call it a day. Characters like Sparky, Chloe, Vicky (Seasons 6-10), Tootie (Seasons 6-7), Mr. Krabs, Dee Dee, Sakura Haruno, etc deserve to have articles on the LCW for example.

I honestly have not been liking the recent decisions made among the staff as of late but I’m not even gonna waste my time arguing with them because it’s like talking to a brick wall. Next thing you know, Seasons 6-8 of The Fairly OddParents might be removed from sister wiki and added here because “pOoF sTaRtEd ThE dOwNfAlL oF ThE sHoW”. And let’s be honest, most YouTube critics aren’t always perfect at providing criticism against a particular show anyway, since they mostly just repeat what people in the comments say instead. The only exceptions are the most overrated shows such as Family Guy, the Simpsons, and of course SpongeBob. And Season 7 should not be the only season of SpongeBob on this wiki.

Seasons 6 and 8 have to come back. Those two seasons may have gotten positive reviews from media critics, but got heavy negative reception from fans. Yeah, there’s no denying that Season 7 is the show’s weakest season since it had more bad episodes than any other season. But, critics aren’t always accurate on what they say about a particular show/movie and just mostly focus too much on the minor problems such as the Poof, Sparky, and Chloe nonsense. The same can even be said for critics who gave that idiotic French film, Cuties, a positive reception, despite the numerous problems that got the film heavy backlash from audiences and rightfully so.

AlfeProblemSolverz (talkcontribs)

Agreed. Seasons 6 and 8 (really Season 6) should return since they have garnered negative reviews. Seasons 6-8 of Fairly OddParents should not be on TTSW and the characters wiki should return. Only opinionated/biased pages such as Cleveland Brown on LCW should not be on the wiki as they are lazily written and are full of generic reasons. Only pages that actually have good information can stay.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Even though Season 8 of SpongeBob slowly started to outdo the flanderization from Seasons 6-7, it still has its fair share of bad episodes like Face Freeze (which is IMO the worst episode in the entire show). The show only really fully went back to its original quality by Season 9.

MirahezeGDPR 24f5838ea4526f1684b2ca1903ad8993 (talkcontribs)

Completely agree. While I don't like Seasons 6-8 of FOP Poof's not to blame I actually like the little guy all he did was be in the background and just say "Poof Poof" sure sometimes it got on my nerves but it's not the reason I hate those seasons I personally find the episode quality since the tonsil episode where Timmy needs his tonsils removed (forgot it's name) has gone severely downhill and many of the characters became flanderized in that season Timmy and Crocker would get it in season 7 as much as I try to find other reasons because it's exactly the same as everyone says I can't I'm fine with 6-8 being on BTSW I know it's well received it's not my cup of tea but it's better of on BTSW just like 5 & 9 of SBSP sure I hate those 2 seasons with a burning passion along with 6-8 but their ok received so it should stay on BTSW

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

TheRandomMan12345, once again, you’re exaggerating about Season 6 of FOP, which makes me think you need to rewatch it and compare it to Seasons 7-8. No character was flanderized except Vicky, Tootie, and Timmy’s parents (and possibly Cosmo as well). But whatever, your opinion.

Could you check your UserBoard for a second?

3
DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

I have posted an update for you.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay, I saw your message and responded. Thanks for the heads up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Sure thing.

Oh I'm sorry

1
Summary by Neat Structure

Pointless insult

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

So because I disagree that episode is good, that automatically makes me a SJW? Keep it up with the pointless insults and you will be reported and blocked.

Don't worry about GarrettTheBigVHSCollector.

2
DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

The truth is, I've been watching the feed from Discord, and I just proceeded to block him for trolling in edits.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Oh okay. I see. I didn't know he was causing trouble offsite. Thanks for the heads up.

Augustborn1996

9
Summary by Neat Structure

The kid keeps asking for miles despite me already giving him an inch. Moving on. Not gonna waste my time.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Why did you revert my edits from "A Very Special Blossom"? I thought it would be a GOOD THING that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes and that the episode can be considered non-canon.

On that note, thats also the case with "Girls Gone Mild", so whats the deal that the characters that don' re-appear in future episodes as well as it be non-canon not being a good thing? Please tell me.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Because judging from your contributions, you used those same sentences in practically every episode article, which can get repetitive. Also, shows in general often have one-time characters anyway, even in bad episodes.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well.....ok that makes a little sinces.

So question, even if its not in the "Redeeming Qualities" Segment, is it both a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I just answered your question already...

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

What do you mean? You said that it gets reptivive seeing in on muitiple articals, I was just asking a question if is both a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon, thats my question.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

“At least this character never appears in future episodes again”, “If you want, you could say that this episode is non-canon”, etc.

These are sentences that you always use in every episode article, which is repetitive. Like I said, every show often features one-time characters anyway, good or bad.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well thank you for answering the first part of my question, but that doesn't answer my question, so again I'll say, is it a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon, Yes or No? Thats all I'm asking.

Sorry for being repetitive.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Error.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

What does that mean? Just asking.

Blocking me for no reason

16
Summary by Neat Structure

Issue resolved. Will return once block is up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I wasn’t trying to remove content from pages. I was just trying to shorten them a little because some of the things in each page were already stated. You can review my edits before blocking unreasonably.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

No, you were blocked because you removed a little bit of content on both this wiki and the sister wiki.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

No, you didn’t review my edits and realize that was never my true intentions. For example, the BQ#8 on the Ed, Edd n Eddy article on the sister wiki is not even a reason for quality. Or are you guys really that paranoid?

DeciduousWater534 (talkcontribs)

I agree that was a redundant BQ, but you removed the reception section and made some pointers less detailed for no reason.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Can you please reduced my block on the Horrible Episodes Wiki to at least a week?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I’ll review all of my recent edits once my blocks are up.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

Alright, since what you did was minor and that you have a lot of work ahead of you, I'll reduce it.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay. And there wasn’t anything wrong my edits at the Jerk of All Trades article but I’m gonna add them back once the block is up.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

That has nothing to do with why you were blocked. While some parts of your edits were constructive, you were also blocked in addition to throwing baseless insults at not only me, but also @User:Blazikeye535

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

You could have at least just let me know what to remove and what not to remove before resorting to that pointless block-first mentality. And the “baseless” edits were only after I got blocked and I have every right to express my frustrations for your wrongful block.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

That is fine, but what's not fine is sending foe requests just after you were blocked.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

So why does the “foe request” exist if it’s prohibited then?

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

We have no idea why it does, but it causes drama when someone accepts a request to be a foe.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I don’t see anything wrong with the edits I made to the Powerpuff Girls and Fairly OddParents articles. You just wanted to revert them for no reason just because you saw me got blocked on sister wiki.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

Not exactly. I'll allow you to review those edits once your block is up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay thanks.

There are no older topics