User talk:Neat Structure

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Could you check your UserBoard for a second?

3
DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

I have posted an update for you.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay, I saw your message and responded. Thanks for the heads up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Sure thing.

Oh I'm sorry

1
Summary by Neat Structure

Pointless insult

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

So because I disagree that episode is good, that automatically makes me a SJW? Keep it up with the pointless insults and you will be reported and blocked.

Don't worry about GarrettTheBigVHSCollector.

2
DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

The truth is, I've been watching the feed from Discord, and I just proceeded to block him for trolling in edits.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Oh okay. I see. I didn't know he was causing trouble offsite. Thanks for the heads up.

Augustborn1996

9
Summary by Neat Structure

The kid keeps asking for miles despite me already giving him an inch. Moving on. Not gonna waste my time.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Why did you revert my edits from "A Very Special Blossom"? I thought it would be a GOOD THING that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes and that the episode can be considered non-canon.

On that note, thats also the case with "Girls Gone Mild", so whats the deal that the characters that don' re-appear in future episodes as well as it be non-canon not being a good thing? Please tell me.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Because judging from your contributions, you used those same sentences in practically every episode article, which can get repetitive. Also, shows in general often have one-time characters anyway, even in bad episodes.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well.....ok that makes a little sinces.

So question, even if its not in the "Redeeming Qualities" Segment, is it both a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I just answered your question already...

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

What do you mean? You said that it gets reptivive seeing in on muitiple articals, I was just asking a question if is both a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon, thats my question.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

“At least this character never appears in future episodes again”, “If you want, you could say that this episode is non-canon”, etc.

These are sentences that you always use in every episode article, which is repetitive. Like I said, every show often features one-time characters anyway, good or bad.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

Well thank you for answering the first part of my question, but that doesn't answer my question, so again I'll say, is it a good thing that the Lead Cop never reappears in future episodes, and that this episode can be considered non-canon, Yes or No? Thats all I'm asking.

Sorry for being repetitive.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Error.

Augustborn1996 (talkcontribs)

What does that mean? Just asking.

Blocking me for no reason

16
Summary by Neat Structure

Issue resolved. Will return once block is up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I wasn’t trying to remove content from pages. I was just trying to shorten them a little because some of the things in each page were already stated. You can review my edits before blocking unreasonably.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

No, you were blocked because you removed a little bit of content on both this wiki and the sister wiki.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

No, you didn’t review my edits and realize that was never my true intentions. For example, the BQ#8 on the Ed, Edd n Eddy article on the sister wiki is not even a reason for quality. Or are you guys really that paranoid?

DeciduousWater534 (talkcontribs)

I agree that was a redundant BQ, but you removed the reception section and made some pointers less detailed for no reason.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Can you please reduced my block on the Horrible Episodes Wiki to at least a week?

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I’ll review all of my recent edits once my blocks are up.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

Alright, since what you did was minor and that you have a lot of work ahead of you, I'll reduce it.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay. And there wasn’t anything wrong my edits at the Jerk of All Trades article but I’m gonna add them back once the block is up.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

That has nothing to do with why you were blocked. While some parts of your edits were constructive, you were also blocked in addition to throwing baseless insults at not only me, but also @DeciduousWater534

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

You could have at least just let me know what to remove and what not to remove before resorting to that pointless block-first mentality. And the “baseless” edits were only after I got blocked and I have every right to express my frustrations for your wrongful block.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

That is fine, but what's not fine is sending foe requests just after you were blocked.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

So why does the “foe request” exist if it’s prohibited then?

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

We have no idea why it does, but it causes drama when someone accepts a request to be a foe.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

I don’t see anything wrong with the edits I made to the Powerpuff Girls and Fairly OddParents articles. You just wanted to revert them for no reason just because you saw me got blocked on sister wiki.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

Not exactly. I'll allow you to review those edits once your block is up.

Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

Okay thanks.

There are no older topics